Manage Employees with MVC Forms
| Name | Gender | Age | State | Department | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Male | 23 | Hawaii | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 23 | Alaska | IT | |
|
|
Female | 36 | Virginia | HR | |
|
|
Male | 59 | Hawaii | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 31 | Oregon | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 28 | New York | IT | |
|
|
Female | 57 | Massachusetts | HR | |
|
|
Male | 51 | Hawaii | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 39 | Maine | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 57 | Hawaii | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 55 | California | IT | |
|
|
Female | 66 | New York | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 65 | Utah | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 43 | Maryland | IT | |
|
|
Female | 30 | Indiana | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 58 | South Carolina | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 22 | Nebraska | IT | |
|
|
Female | 61 | Virginia | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 50 | Utah | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 35 | Colorado | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 56 | South Carolina | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 29 | Wyoming | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 48 | North Carolina | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 30 | Alaska | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 50 | Michigan | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 57 | Louisiana | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 30 | Oregon | HR | |
|
|
Male | 64 | Idaho | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 56 | Louisiana | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 43 | Florida | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 37 | Delaware | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 22 | Nebraska | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 50 | Texas | HR | |
|
|
Female | 36 | Michigan | HR | |
|
|
Male | 27 | Oklahoma | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 53 | South Dakota | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 54 | Indiana | IT | |
|
|
Male | 28 | Arkansas | IT | |
|
|
Male | 23 | Vermont | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 44 | New York | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 66 | North Carolina | IT | |
|
|
Female | 22 | Maryland | IT | |
|
|
Female | 20 | Maine | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 39 | Illinois | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 19 | Iowa | HR | |
|
|
Female | 61 | Connecticut | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 44 | South Carolina | HR | |
|
|
Male | 47 | California | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 21 | Louisiana | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 70 | Indiana | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 67 | Colorado | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 53 | Kentucky | IT | |
|
|
Male | 49 | Colorado | HR | |
|
|
Male | 20 | Indiana | HR | |
|
|
Male | 26 | West Virginia | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 65 | Maryland | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 61 | South Carolina | IT | |
|
|
Male | 63 | Maryland | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 38 | Colorado | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 52 | New Jersey | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 41 | Washington | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 38 | Indiana | HR | |
|
|
Female | 20 | Oklahoma | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 37 | Tennessee | IT | |
|
|
Male | 41 | Alaska | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 56 | Idaho | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 37 | Nevada | HR | |
|
|
Female | 44 | Massachusetts | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 41 | Vermont | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 52 | Washington | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 55 | Illinois | IT | |
|
|
Male | 56 | New Mexico | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 34 | Indiana | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 58 | North Dakota | HR | |
|
|
Female | 50 | New Hampshire | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 44 | Georgia | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 40 | New York | IT | |
|
|
Female | 33 | Illinois | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 26 | South Carolina | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 61 | Vermont | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 53 | Alaska | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 46 | Nebraska | IT | |
|
|
Male | 42 | New Hampshire | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 38 | Louisiana | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 37 | Maryland | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 58 | North Dakota | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 55 | Idaho | IT | |
|
|
Female | 67 | Illinois | IT | |
|
|
Female | 35 | Montana | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 31 | South Dakota | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 18 | Rhode Island | IT | |
|
|
Male | 62 | Vermont | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 31 | Montana | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 38 | Oklahoma | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 36 | Michigan | HR | |
|
|
Male | 37 | New York | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 51 | Idaho | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 59 | Kentucky | HR | |
|
|
Female | 51 | Alaska | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 44 | Hawaii | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 60 | Alaska | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 50 | New York | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 67 | Missouri | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 64 | Missouri | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 58 | Ohio | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 63 | Connecticut | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 69 | Rhode Island | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 43 | Alaska | IT | |
|
|
Male | 50 | Maine | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 19 | Florida | HR | |
|
|
Female | 41 | Mississippi | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 61 | New Jersey | HR | |
|
|
Female | 59 | Pennsylvania | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 31 | Pennsylvania | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 45 | North Carolina | IT | |
|
|
Male | 50 | New Jersey | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 45 | Colorado | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 65 | Maryland | IT | |
|
|
Female | 35 | South Carolina | IT | |
|
|
Female | 20 | Kentucky | HR | |
|
|
Female | 38 | North Dakota | HR | |
|
|
Female | 27 | Minnesota | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 28 | Alabama | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 63 | Wisconsin | IT | |
|
|
Male | 27 | Iowa | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 46 | Kentucky | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 41 | Colorado | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 42 | Louisiana | IT | |
|
|
Male | 64 | South Carolina | HR | |
|
|
Male | 69 | Wyoming | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 28 | Pennsylvania | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 60 | Hawaii | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 26 | Alabama | HR | |
|
|
Female | 60 | Connecticut | HR | |
|
|
Male | 19 | New York | IT | |
|
|
Male | 40 | Montana | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 50 | Ohio | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 64 | South Dakota | HR | |
|
|
Female | 48 | Michigan | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 27 | Alaska | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 56 | Georgia | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 30 | Georgia | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 35 | Florida | IT | |
|
|
Female | 66 | South Dakota | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 54 | Alabama | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 40 | California | IT | |
|
|
Female | 43 | Alaska | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 66 | Tennessee | IT | |
|
|
Male | 29 | Idaho | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 18 | Tennessee | HR | |
|
|
Male | 27 | Connecticut | IT | |
|
|
Male | 63 | Nevada | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 59 | New Hampshire | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 63 | North Carolina | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 38 | Alaska | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 53 | Michigan | IT | |
|
|
Female | 25 | Louisiana | IT | |
|
|
Female | 27 | Arizona | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 47 | Florida | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 66 | Kansas | IT | |
|
|
Male | 56 | Alaska | HR | |
|
|
Male | 35 | Oregon | HR | |
|
|
Female | 47 | Delaware | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 61 | Oklahoma | HR | |
|
|
Female | 55 | Pennsylvania | HR | |
|
|
Male | 53 | North Dakota | HR | |
|
|
Female | 70 | Nevada | HR | |
|
|
Male | 27 | Utah | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 18 | New Hampshire | HR | |
|
|
Female | 46 | Delaware | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 23 | Rhode Island | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 53 | Minnesota | HR | |
|
|
Male | 35 | North Carolina | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 27 | Wisconsin | HR | |
|
|
Male | 21 | North Carolina | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 37 | Nevada | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 19 | Louisiana | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 38 | Maine | IT | |
|
|
Female | 32 | Illinois | HR | |
|
|
Male | 61 | Idaho | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 52 | New Jersey | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 32 | Virginia | HR | |
|
|
Female | 64 | California | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 65 | Idaho | IT | |
|
|
Female | 69 | Iowa | IT | |
|
|
Female | 55 | Pennsylvania | HR | |
|
|
Female | 65 | Delaware | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 22 | Alabama | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 29 | Indiana | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 65 | Delaware | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 35 | Texas | IT | |
|
|
Male | 28 | Texas | HR | |
|
|
Male | 37 | Indiana | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 25 | Rhode Island | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 48 | North Dakota | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 60 | South Dakota | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 66 | Massachusetts | HR | |
|
|
Female | 34 | Illinois | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 39 | West Virginia | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 27 | Maryland | HR | |
|
|
Male | 65 | Michigan | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 45 | Georgia | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 57 | Alabama | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 68 | Delaware | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 43 | North Dakota | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 38 | California | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 31 | Kansas | HR | |
|
|
Female | 69 | South Carolina | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 29 | Connecticut | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 69 | Idaho | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 40 | Kansas | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 60 | Illinois | IT | |
|
|
Female | 44 | Utah | HR | |
|
|
Female | 44 | West Virginia | IT | |
|
|
Female | 25 | Connecticut | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 23 | Rhode Island | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 42 | Arkansas | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 61 | Mississippi | HR | |
|
|
Female | 61 | Pennsylvania | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 25 | Oregon | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 22 | Louisiana | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 69 | North Dakota | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 24 | Alabama | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 28 | Missouri | HR | |
|
|
Female | 64 | Indiana | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 22 | Nebraska | HR | |
|
|
Male | 53 | Kentucky | HR | |
|
|
Male | 43 | Maryland | IT | |
|
|
Male | 45 | New York | IT | |
|
|
Male | 67 | Vermont | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 20 | New York | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 68 | Arkansas | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 54 | Washington | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 45 | Virginia | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 67 | Iowa | HR | |
|
|
Male | 57 | California | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 25 | Washington | HR | |
|
|
Male | 31 | Maryland | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 62 | New Jersey | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 21 | Alaska | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 53 | Delaware | IT | |
|
|
Male | 43 | Idaho | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 53 | Massachusetts | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 55 | California | IT | |
|
|
Female | 36 | Alabama | HR | |
|
|
Female | 54 | Mississippi | IT | |
|
|
Male | 21 | Wyoming | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 64 | South Dakota | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 45 | Montana | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 39 | South Carolina | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 69 | Ohio | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 54 | Oregon | IT | |
|
|
Female | 23 | New Hampshire | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 32 | New York | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 32 | North Dakota | IT | |
|
|
Male | 55 | Mississippi | IT | |
|
|
Male | 70 | Virginia | IT | |
|
|
Male | 49 | Oregon | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 33 | Kentucky | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 24 | Nevada | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 66 | New Hampshire | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 61 | Pennsylvania | HR | |
|
|
Female | 37 | Washington | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 32 | Rhode Island | IT | |
|
|
Male | 36 | Oklahoma | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 25 | Louisiana | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 25 | Ohio | HR | |
|
|
Female | 57 | Washington | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 41 | Kansas | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 54 | Massachusetts | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 21 | Indiana | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 36 | Wyoming | HR | |
|
|
Male | 55 | Florida | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 59 | Connecticut | IT | |
|
|
Female | 60 | Ohio | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 37 | Delaware | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 66 | New Hampshire | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 37 | Illinois | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 62 | Florida | HR | |
|
|
Male | 22 | Georgia | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 70 | Vermont | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 44 | South Carolina | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 46 | Ohio | HR | |
|
|
Male | 40 | Oklahoma | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 32 | Pennsylvania | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 50 | New Jersey | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 69 | Vermont | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 55 | Colorado | IT | |
|
|
Female | 48 | Montana | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 48 | Kentucky | IT | |
|
|
Female | 66 | California | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 42 | Mississippi | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 56 | Montana | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 46 | Pennsylvania | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 54 | Utah | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 63 | Wisconsin | HR | |
|
|
Female | 26 | Mississippi | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 64 | Delaware | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 40 | Alabama | Accounting |
MVC Forms Approach in ASP.NET MVC
The MVC Forms approach allows developers to build applications with strong separation of concerns, making it easier to maintain and scale. It supports robust form handling and validation mechanisms, enabling secure and efficient data entry and modification.
Best Practices for MVC Forms:
- Utilize
[HttpGet]and[HttpPost]attributes for appropriate routing and data handling. - Implement validation using Data Annotations or custom validation logic.
- Use
to prevent CSRF attacks.
Pros and Cons of MVC Forms Approach:
- Pros: Clear separation of concerns, easy to test, comprehensive model binding and validation support.
- Cons: Can become complex with large forms, requires knowledge of HTML helpers and model binding.
Microsoft continues to support the MVC architecture, providing ongoing updates and improvements. With .NET 8, ASP.NET MVC remains a reliable choice for building web applications with a clean, maintainable architecture.
CRUD Functionality in MVC
In classic MVC architecture, CRUD operations are implemented using Controller actions and views for each activity: Create, Read, Update, and Delete. The Create action uses a form to capture new employee data, which is saved to the database upon submission. The Read action displays a list of employees retrieved from the database, as seen in the table above. Update allows editing of an employee's details, while Delete provides a confirmation before removal.
You can generate views for each CRUD operation directly from your Entity Framework entities using scaffolding tools. This automates the process of creating views and wiring up the controller. However, it is best practice to use ViewModels rather than exposing your entities directly to the view, ensuring better separation of concerns and security.